‘PLAYING FOR KEEPS’ (2012). A man tries to find a new life when he moves to be closer to his son, only to hit come complications. Text © Rissi JC


March 27, 2013 18 Comments

Romantic comedies are one of my weaknesses. It’s a guilty pleasure that results in memorable favorites and some that leave a bad taste. This one falls somewhere in-between; the concept is cute and seems more realistic than not, however the morals leave much to be desired.

Playing for Keeps (2012) Film Review

George (Gerard Butler) did have a charmed life. A professional soccer star, over ten years after his career began, he’s now being forced to retire after an injury at the age of thirty-six. Unsure what comes next, he moves to Virginia where his ex-wife, Stacy (Jessica Biel) and young son Lewis (Noah Lomax) live. Now he must pursue a new career. Nine-year-old Lewis’ soccer team is being coached by a man who has no understanding of the game, George accidentally gets roped into coaching the team, and seems to impress the parents. Especially the mothers which include the recently divorced, Barb (Judy Greer); the once famous and wealthy Denise (Catherine Zeta-Jones); and forgotten trophy wife Patti (Uma Thurman).

Everything is about to go sideways.

Films that blatantly degrade ethical values and consistently engage in inappropriate behavior are off-putting. Particularly those of us who like the hero to be good; upstanding in a way we can justifiably root for him. George isn’t honorable. In one moment, he struggles with Stacy’s choices, and in the other he has a wandering eye who falls (willingly) into the trap women set for him. It’s annoying and makes it hard to forgive him.

FILM REVIEW | ‘The Bounty Hunter’ – A Buddy Comedy and Fun Romance
‘PLAYING FOR KEEPS’ (2012) #FWarchives Click To Tweet
‘PLAYING FOR KEEPS’ (2012). A man tries to find a new life when he moves to be closer to his son, only to hit come complications. Text © Rissi JC

Masking some of the imperfections is a breezy, cute script that is actually infectious in its pursuit of being a comedy. It’s full of stereotypes but becomes a sweet romance that teaches its leading man what the meaning of love and family is. Helping to sell this idea is the cute child actor Noah Lomax whose outgoing acting and freckled face helps humanize George. The all-star cast also is convincing, mixing some charisma, Oscar nominees and recognizable faces. I enjoy Biel’s Stacy. Then there is George whose flaws number too many to keep count of. He has a kind of charm that almost makes viewers wish to forgive him – which from my point of view has nothing to do with the actor – and in most instances, we do because sappy or not, the usual outcome is what we want to see.

Approximately three-fourths of the way through the runtime, it becomes obvious part of the plot is pointless. It’s there for mere conflict as opposed to supporting or furthering the plot. Regardless of the writer in me recognizing this as a “flaw,” the part of me that is merely a viewer looking for a good night’s worth of entertainment found this one amusing. Demanding more from stories may be something everyone should look for, and yet, originality is harder than we give it credit for. That being said, Playing for Keeps is fun. It’s got a sweet ending with some likable characters that while, not a favorite, is one that I’ll likely see again.

(Disclosure: this post does contain affiliate links; if you buy anything through these links, I may receive a small percentage of the sale at no extra cost to you. Thank you to anyone who makes a purchase through these links. Read the disclosure page for details.)

You can find Playing for Keeps digitally on Amazon Video

Content: There’s two implied sexual encounters, both of which are nothing more than a one-night stand scenario. One scene shows a woman stripped down to her underwear trying to seduce a man – he refuses, sending her away. Sexual innuendo is present cropping up in the script at various points. An unmarried couple live together. Profanity is infrequent; Lewis cops an attitude with his parent’s a time or two. The film is PG13.

About Rissi JC

amateur graphic designer. confirmed bookaholic. bubbl’r enthusiast. critical thinker. miswesterner. social media coordinator. writer.

Rissi JC

amateur graphic designer. confirmed bookaholic. bubbl’r enthusiast. critical thinker. miswesterner. social media coordinator. writer.

All posts


  • Ruth March 27, 2013 at 12:51 PM

    I feel like it has been FOREVER since Gerard Butler was in anything I was excited about seeing (this movie…I'm feeling rather "meh"). My favorite film of his is still Dear Frankie. :)

    • Rissi March 28, 2013 at 1:15 AM

      Hey, Ruth! Glad you stopped in. :)

      This one was cute if nothing else, Ruth. It had its moments like every rom-com and best of all, was relatively clean with more "innuendo" than seeing everything. Aw, Dear Frankie was a sweet one. I remember it was a bit too slow-moving for my tastes (plus maybe the ending was a bit… open-ended?) but you and Melissa make me want to see it again. :)

  • Melissa Tagg March 27, 2013 at 1:23 PM

    Oh man, I had the exact same reaction to this movie. It could've been so fun. Instead it was full of cliches and, like you said, totally pointless plot points that led nowhere. Sometimes I'm good at silencing the critiquer in me, but this one I just couldn't. I was disappointed.

    Oh, Ruth above mentioned Dear Frankie…that is one of the sweetest movies ever!!

    • Rissi March 28, 2013 at 3:24 AM

      Didn't like George's casual flings in this scenario, Melissa. I mean, he was still supposed to be in love with Stacy and then… well, he messed up. More than once (the irony of he and Stacy's break-up was that the compromising photos she saw was the one "fling" he did not have). Anyway, I thought it was "cute" and will watch it again, just not a "classic." :)

      Dear Frankie was sweet. You and Ruth make me want to re-watch it now. :)

      Lovely of you to stop in, Melissa – appreciate your thoughts!

  • Gwendolyn Gage March 27, 2013 at 5:01 PM

    Thanks for the review, Rissi. You're right, when the hero doesn't have many admirable qualities, it can spoil what would have been a cute movie. I can handle a hero with real flaws, but when a movie goes so far as to show immorality in action, that I have a problem with. :-)

    • Rissi March 28, 2013 at 3:26 AM

      Oh, me too, Gwendolyn. I mean, sometimes if the film has charisma (this one did), I can put it aside however, this won't become a fave. I liked it though because it was "cute" and I'm a sucker for rom-coms. :)

      Movies like this make me wonder where all the good guys are. :)

  • Angela March 27, 2013 at 5:39 PM

    I was excited about this movie, but I did expect it to be a bit cheesy. I still want to see it though. :)

    • Rissi March 28, 2013 at 3:28 AM

      It is cute, Angela. I mean I'll enjoy watching it now and again. Just isn't the "best" rom-com. :)


  • Jennifer March 27, 2013 at 6:57 PM

    Gerard Butler = Phantom of the Opera

    The. End.

    I can't see him in any other role.


    • Rissi March 28, 2013 at 3:30 AM

      LOL! I like him in a select few, Jennifer. Enjoyed 'Phantom' and this one is cute. :)

  • Cathy March 27, 2013 at 11:17 PM

    Hi Rissi, found your lovely blog through Goodreads! Excited to follow your reviews. :)

    I love romantic comedies and was wondering about this one. Glad I stopped by and read your review! I also noticed your post on Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast being made into movies. I'll have to tell my daughter about those ones!

    Hope to visit more. :)

    • Rissi March 28, 2013 at 3:35 AM

      Hello, Cathy! How great to have you as a new follower – welcome and I hope you enjoy your visits. :)

      Playing for Keeps is cute, if not totally morally upstanding. If you see it, I hope you enjoy. :)

      Yes! We are all excited about the upcoming live-action versions of Cinderella and 'Beauty.' They have promise even in the early stages. Have you seen Once Upon a Time, ABC's weekly television show? It's really creative and intertwines all of the fairytales. Hope your daughter is as excited as we are about these adaptations! :)

      Thanks for the follow. Visit anytime. :)

  • Sabrina Musco March 28, 2013 at 7:03 AM
    • Rissi March 28, 2013 at 11:19 PM

      Thank you, Sabrina. :)

  • Kara March 29, 2013 at 6:25 AM

    Why is it that Hollywood insists on making cute movies but adding all this unnecessary and yucky stuff and almost ruining the cute factor? There are so many cute movies that I really like, yet almost all of them have at least one scene if not several that could be cut from the movie and not take anything away from the viewers enjoyment of it. It's a sad testament to the world and culture we live in. :(

    That aside, I have to agree with Ruth. Dear Frankie is a wonderful movie! Although I definitely agree with you too, in that the open ending kinda disappointed me. But at least that way I can imagine exactly what I wanted to happen. ;D

    As for this one? I'm not rushing out to get it anytime soon. But if the opportunity crops up, I probably wouldn't turn it down either.

    • Rissi March 29, 2013 at 8:50 PM

      Kara, you and I agree EXACTLY when it comes to the filth of Hollywood movies. It's both disheartening and awful because as you say, they would be better without these scenes (that's the real tragedy!) – and believe it or not, most people would relish a more wholesome movie. What's most sad is that young teens are watching this stuff and their parent's don't have a clue! I will say as rom-coms go, this is one of the "cleaner" – there's rarely any profanity and more implications than visuals.

      I remember liking Dear Frankie, just not adoring it. Nonetheless it was certainly one – as is Playing for Keeps – that I'd re-watch. The only good thing about open-ended films (like Dear John) is that, yes, we can "write" our own ending. Sometimes, ours are even better. :)

      If you see it, Kara, let me know what you thought. :)

  • his little lady March 29, 2013 at 10:47 PM

    I know that this movie didn't get good reviews but I'm a sucker for romantic comedies too! Need to see this and rent it on redbox!
    xo TJ

    • Rissi March 30, 2013 at 8:55 PM

      Hey, TJ! Usually I don't really pay much attention to what mainstream critics say to be honest as most of the time I really like these light-hearted movies. Hope you like this one also – let me know what you think.

      BTW: Your new profile pic is adorbs. ;)

    Leave a Reply

    (Enter your URL then click here to include a link to one of your blog posts.)

    Bonjour and Welcome!

    Welcome | thank you for visiting and reading. if you like, you are invited to join our conversations and follow along – join us.  You’re most welcome.
    Read more about Finding Wonderland

    Finding Wonderland Elsewhere!

    Finding Wonderland in your Inbox!

    Subscribe! Have Finding Wonderland's new content sent to your inbox; sign up for our once (or twice) monthly round up of new content. If you'd like to have this newsletter sent to your inbox, you can enter your email address here. Please note, this does require a sign-up confirmation via email, and that email may be sent to a junk or spam folder.

    RSS Feed

    Enter your email address:



    Some of the links on this blog are affiliate links, which means that if you click on a product link, I may receive (a small) compensation. This compensation comes at no additional cost to you.

    Rissi JC (RissiWrites.com) is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

    All written content (unless noted) is © Copyright Rissi JC and Finding Wonderland (RissiWrites.com).


    %d bloggers like this: