When in Rome (2010)

October 15, 2011
Josh Duhamel and Kristen Bell in When In Rome


During a
work-related trip which took my dad away from home for a few days, my mom and I
had a fun outing, and as part of it, we went to see this during its theater run.
I came out of the theater thinking it was “okay,” but by no means did I adore When in Rome. Now available to DVD, I
think after a second viewing, it has grown on me.

 
Beth
(Kristen Bell) is a hard-working young woman who consequently has become the
youngest curator at her firm. All that is well and good save for her lack of luck when it comes to love. Her former boyfriend dumped her because she was too
devoted to her work – something she explains away, saying when she meets
someone she likes more than her work… then she’ll just know she’s found Mr. Right.
Her boss, Celeste (Anjelica Huston) is expecting perfection from Beth on their
next event. When her sister, Joan (Alexis Dziena) announces her engagement – to an Italian whom she met a mere two weeks ago but claims he’s “the one,” Beth
has not choice but to leave her job for a 48 hour trip to Rome.


There she meets, Nick (Josh Duhamel). As the best man, he seems to be of the same mindset as Beth, and after a
piece of advice from dad, she decides to be open to the possibility of love,
which backfires on her. Spontaneously, she grabs four coins from the
Fountain of Love in defiance of the goddess overlooking the fountain, and
returns home to her quiet life. Unbelieving of some ancient myth, Beth is taken
aback, when she is suddenly overwhelmed with not one… not two… but five gentlemen pursuing her!

I cannot
really find too much to complain about in regards to this movie. It’s sweet…
and romantic… and funny… and romantic (did I mention this!?)… and, well, you get the idea. It takes a
few liberties from the usual way of romantic-comedies, which can either be a
total flop or make it work. In this case, it really wasn’t one or the other,
but somewhere in-between.



For the most
part, When in Rome is endearing. And
I like that about it. It has a kind of innocence all too often absent from this
genre. Some of the responses can be really sappy, but that is really a part of
its appeal. It is meant to be foolish, which it is – sometimes in abundance. The
entire premise opens the door to some mild forms of magic, because of the
“spell” the guys are said to be under. (It’s an idea that can seem a little
creepy at times.) The guys whose coins Beth removes from the fountain are all a
little… odd and yet I can appreciate writers making them thus since,
obviously there is only one guy we root for Beth to end up with.

Josh Duhamel and Kristen Bell When in Rome Wedding


Bookending
the film in Rome adds a great deal of spontaneous romance. Much of the movie
was filmed on location, both in New York and Italy, which helps in the
realistic and charming picture it wants to present. At the theater, I did come
away liking the movie – it provided
some laughs and the leading couple were adorable together. (Seriously, Josh and
Kristen have some really good sparks, even provided this isn’t your top-notch
romance; they were just too cute!).


Initial impressions didn’t leave me love with this one (which surprised me) and now, a few viewings later, I do find it quirky in a delightful way, and somehow, enchanting.Now, I think I can say it has become one of my
favorite feel-good flicks – if only because it’s more wholesome than most.
Sometimes, I crave something that is silly without intelligent thought requiring
a lot of serious consideration. When in
Rome
meets – and surpasses, those requirements.

Share some
of your favorite silly movies…
CONTENT: This is actually really clean for a PG13-rating.  One of the “suitors” likes to strip his shirt off
to display his “beauty.” A painting of a nude Beth briefly appears on the side of a
building. Nude sketches are evident when someone flips
through a sketch book. After their first date, Beth and
Nick make it to his apartment where they progress to making out. Joan and her
husband are seen kissing and flirting in the nude; nothing graphic. There may be some other winking sexual references. A wedding finds
a lot of people drunk, including Beth who takes an entire bottle outside and
continues to drink. Other instances depict drinking.

 

7 Comments

  • Ella

    October 15, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    I needed a second viewing for this as well….the first time, it was just too dumb ;-) But now, I really love it…..how can one not love Kristen Bell and Josh Duhamel?!?! She is petite (like me) and he is so cute. LOL

    Sadly, I think they had to make it a PG-13 so people would go and see it. Seriously, it barely warranted the rating and is much cleaner than A LOT of the ones out there today!

  • Renee (SteelerGirl83)

    October 16, 2011 at 2:35 am

    Ahh! I loved this movie mainly because of the setting, I mean it's Rome!!!! The story is cute too and it helps that Nick and Joan's fiancee are both super cute guys. ;-)

    XOXO~ Renee C.

  • Rissi

    October 16, 2011 at 4:19 am

    Ella – I know what you mean! I "liked" the movie after the 1st viewing but it has really grown on me since. It's just one of those titles that one can watch without needing to "think." Josh and Kristen are SO cute together. =)

    It is really disappointing how much filth Hollywood likes to put into movies nowadays, so whenever I find one that is clean, it's refreshing. This was one of those.

    Glad you stopped in, Ella – it seems like it's been a while. =)

    Renee – Rome always makes a HUGE difference to the setting of a movie – or any foreign location, really. It all adds to the "romance" of it all, right!? So great! Who doesn't dream of travelling overseas – Paris… England… Rome…

    Josh is not only good-looking, but he's a pretty good actor too; love the movies I've seen him in. =D

  • Annie

    October 16, 2011 at 8:39 pm

    I saw this movie a while ago and I thought essentially the same thing. I wonder how seriously the moviemakers took themselves and the screenplay, because it almost seems like they didn't intend to take it very seriously, and that we probably shouldn't either. In any case, it's very lighthearted and I probably made a few sarcastic comments about how sappy it was while I was watching it – because it really is very sappy at times.

    Thanks for your comment on my blog! I'm encouraged every time someone tells me they aren't Twilight fans either. Not that it's necessarily a bad thing to like, but I really think there are far, far better books and material to fill your mind with.

  • Rissi

    October 17, 2011 at 4:27 pm

    I am always rolling my eyes or giggling at something sappy in the continuous rom-coms I see… but I love them, so I keep watching them. =) You are right, I don't think "When in Rome" is meant to be taken seriously. The ending is really sweet (minus the whole dancing bit) and the acting is decent. Some people don't like these movies because it "insults" their intelligence, but I say, enjoy it for what it is: lighthearted entertainment. =)

    Yeah, I am not a fan of "Twilight." I've read a lot about it, but just am not interested in reading it or seeing the films.

    Thank you for dropping by, Annie! Finding a comment on a post is such fun – and the best part of blogging. =D So, please visit again sometime.

  • Meghan

    October 18, 2011 at 1:41 am

    Hehehehe….gosh Josh Duhamel is dreamy. *Sigh*
    Ahem….LOVE the movie–one of my favorites!

  • Rissi

    October 18, 2011 at 2:23 am

    Love Josh in every role I've seen him in to date… now his wife, that is a different story. ;D

    I really enjoy "When in Rome" for its cute premise – and wholesomeness. All this talk makes me want to watch it again, so I should. =)

    So glad you stopped in, Meghan! It's been a while. =)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Enter your URL then click here to include a link to one of your blog posts.)

Prev Post Next Post
Follow

Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox:

%d bloggers like this: